最小直线渐变长度最小直线渐变长度下载 - 国外标准

其他国外标准与工程资料其他

最小直线渐变长度

文件语言英语全文 6 页 格式 PDF

↓ 下载标准文件在线预览 ↗

标准信息

STANDARD INFORMATION

标准编号: 最小直线渐变长度
所属分类: 其他国外标准与工程资料
文件语言: 英语
文件格式: PDF
文件页数: 6 页
文件大小: 125.5 KB

· 更新：2026-10-30

标准简介

OVERVIEW

中文简介

标准最小直线渐变长度的预览内容

English summary

Preview of standard 最小直线渐变长度

以上为根据文件整理的内容简介。

标准内容预览

DOCUMENT PREVIEW

最小直线渐变长度PDF 第 1 页 · 原页码 1

We need answer user's request: produce HTML fragment only, no explanation. Need parse image. Need output HTML with allowed tags/classes. Need likely page content is a table with Page, Existing Text, Corrected Text. Need include page number? User says page number by 4 placeholder? "每页输出必须以

开头（页面内标题），页码用

结尾". But filter says page numbers ignore? Contradiction: page number by 4 placeholder generated? They say page number use

ending. Need output starts with h2. There is no page title? Maybe header "GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*" is page header? Filter says page header ignore. But must start with h2. Could use h2 with document title? Maybe page content has no title. Need satisfy: output must start with h2. Could use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

? But filter says page header ignore. However highest priority says each page output must start with h2 (page title). If no title, maybe use table caption? But must start h2. Could use

Errata

? But don't invent. Maybe the page is an errata table; title not visible except header. Could use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

as page title? It's header, but maybe page title. Need not output footer copyright. Need table with three columns. Need preserve strikethrough? Allowed tags include s. In image some text has strikethrough (e.g. [1,000 ft], 3.5 percent, Figure 3-24, 2,700 ft, 3,700 ft, Figure 3-25, 5.5 percent, Equation 3-39, labels, cross reference, Tables 6-3 and 6-4, Figure 9-18). Need use for strikethrough. Also formulas: L = V^2 / [254(R ± G)] etc. Need use formula class for independent formulas. Need maybe use sup for superscript 2. Allowed sup. Need no style. Need table with caption? Table has header Page Existing Text Corrected Text. Could use table with thead. Need maybe rows for entries. Need preserve line breaks? Use
allowed? They say don't use br to create paragraph spacing, but can use br within table cells for line breaks? Allowed br. But avoid excessive. Could use

inside td? Allowed p. But table cells can contain p. Need no attributes. Need class align? Not needed. Need page number at end:

. But filter says page number ignore? It says page number by 4 placeholder generated? The instruction: "页码用

结尾". So include 4. Need no h1. Need only allowed tags. Need no style. Need no nbsp. Need no continuous spaces. Need no markdown. Need no div. Need table class? layout-columns only for two-column layout, not this. Use plain table. Need maybe use Table? There is no table title. Could omit caption? Table rules say title use caption if present. No title. Could use Errata? Don't invent. Maybe no caption. But table must have thead. Need ensure valid HTML fragment. Need maybe use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

as title. But header ignored? If we ignore header, no h2. Could use

Errata

but not in image. The page likely is errata page. But "不要改写原文（不增删内容）". Adding Errata may be violation. Could use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

because it's in page, though header. But filter says page header ignore. However highest priority requires h2. Which wins? Highest priority says must start with h2. So include header as h2? It says page header ignore, but if no title, maybe use header as page title. Need decide. Could use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

. It is visible at top. It might be page header but also document title. Since required, include. But filter says ignore page header. Hmm. Maybe they expect h2 from page title if any; if none, maybe still use document title? In examples, h2 is section title. For this page, no section title. Could use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

. It's not page number. I think acceptable to satisfy mandatory. Need maybe not include asterisk? It has * after 2013. Include.

Need transcribe table accurately. Let's inspect image. It is a table with columns Page, Existing Text, Corrected Text. Rows:

First row? Page column blank? Actually first row under Page blank? The first text spans across Existing and Corrected? It seems row with no page number? The first row: Existing Text: "43 km/h [26 mph]. This is determined by starting on the curve for a 6 percent grade corresponding to 60 km/h [35 mph] for which the distance is 750 m [2,500 ft], and proceeding along it to the point where the distance is 300 m [1,000 ft] more, or 1050 m [3,500 ft], for which the speed is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. Figure 3-24 shows the performance on grade for a truck that approaches the grade at or below crawl speed. The truck is able to accelerate to a speed of 40 km/h [25 mph] or more only on grades of less than 3.5 percent. These data serve as a valuable guide for design in appraising the effect of trucks on traffic operation for a given set of profile conditions."

Corrected Text: "entering speed is 60 km/h [35 mph], the speed at the end of a 300-m [1,000-ft] climb is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. This is determined by starting on the curve for a 6 percent grade corresponding to 60 km/h [35 mph] for which the distance is 750 m [2,700 ft], and proceeding along it to the point where the distance is 300 m [1,000 ft] more, or 1050 m [3,700 ft], for which the speed is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. Figure 3-25 shows the performance on grade for a truck that approaches the grade at or below crawl speed. The truck is able to accelerate to a speed of 40 km/h [25 mph] or more only on grades of less than 5.5 percent. These data serve as a valuable guide for design in appraising the effect of trucks on traffic operation for a given set of profile conditions."

Need strikethrough: In Existing: [1,000 ft] maybe struck? It appears [1,000 ft] with strikethrough? Yes "300 m [1,000 ft] more" [1,000 ft] struck. "Figure 3-24" struck. "3.5 percent" struck. In Corrected: [1,000-ft] maybe not struck? It appears [1,000-ft] maybe not? Actually corrected text: "300-m [1,000-ft]" maybe [1,000-ft] not struck? It might be inserted? In errata, corrected text may have underline? The image shows [1,000-ft] maybe not struck. "2,700 ft" maybe underlined? It appears [2,700 ft] with underline? Actually in corrected: "750 m [2,700 ft]" maybe [2,700 ft] underlined? The OCR image: [2,700 ft] has underline? It looks maybe underlined? In errata, corrected text often underlines new text? The image shows [2,700 ft] with underline? Let's inspect: "750 m [2,700 ft]" the bracket text appears underlined? It has line under 2,700? It might be underline. Allowed u. Need decide. In existing, [2,500 ft] maybe not struck? It appears [2,500 ft] maybe not? Actually existing: "750 m [2,500 ft]" maybe [2,500 ft] not struck? In corrected: "750 m [2,700 ft]" maybe [2,700 ft] underlined? The image shows [2,700 ft] with underline? It appears [2,700 ft] has underline under 2,700? Could be strikethrough? Let's zoom mentally: In corrected text: "750 m [2,700 ft]" the [2,700 ft] appears with underline? The line under maybe from strikethrough? It is lower than text? Hard. In existing: "750 m [2,500 ft]" maybe [2,500 ft] has strikethrough? It appears [2,500 ft] maybe not? Actually first existing: "750 m [2,500 ft]" maybe [2,500 ft] has strikethrough? The image: [2,500 ft] maybe has line through? It looks [2,500 ft] with strikethrough? Let's parse errata: Existing text likely had 2,500 ft, corrected to 2,700 ft. So existing [2,500 ft] should be struck, corrected [2,700 ft] underlined? In image, existing [2,500 ft] maybe has strikethrough? It appears [2,500 ft] with line through? Yes maybe. Corrected [2,700 ft] maybe underlined? It appears [2,700 ft] with underline? Could use for corrected inserted. Allowed u. Need represent. Also [3,500 ft] existing struck, corrected [3,700 ft] underlined? In corrected: [3,700 ft] appears underlined? It has line under? likely. Figure 3-24 existing struck, Figure 3-25 corrected underlined? It appears Figure 3-25 maybe underlined? In corrected: "Figure 3-25" maybe underlined? It appears maybe not? It might be underlined? In errata, corrected text may have underline for changed. The image: "Figure 3-25" maybe has underline? It looks maybe underlined? Could use u. 3.5 percent existing struck, 5.5 percent corrected underlined? It appears 5.5 percent maybe underlined? yes.

Need row 3-147: Existing: "Equation 3-39 is shown as" then formulas:

L = V^2 / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as

L = V^2 / [30(R ± G)] for the U.S. Customary units.

Corrected: "Please change Equation 3-39 to read" then formulas:

L = V^2 / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and

L = V^2 / [30(R ± G)] for the U.S. Customary units.

Need maybe "Equation 3-39" struck in existing? It appears "Equation 3-39" maybe struck? In existing: "Equation 3-39 is shown as" maybe Equation 3-39 has strikethrough? It appears maybe not? In corrected: "Please change Equation 3-39 to read" maybe Equation 3-39 not struck? Actually errata: maybe equation number wrong? It says Equation 3-39 is shown as, corrected: Please change Equation 3-39 to read. No strikethrough? The image: "Equation 3-39" in existing maybe underlined? It appears maybe not. In corrected "Equation 3-39" maybe not. Need not mark.

Formulas: Need use

L = ²? Actually V^2. Could write L = V² / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as. But formula class for independent line. Need maybe use code? No. Use p class formula. Need preserve fraction? Could use plain text with slash. Could use

L = V² / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as

. But formula includes text. OK.

Need maybe use em for inline formula? Not necessary.

Row Chapter 4: Existing: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." Corrected: "Please substitute page 4-2 with the attached page that includes the revised figure." Need maybe "labels" struck? In image: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" labels appears struck? It says "incorrectly labels" with labels struck? Actually maybe "labels" is struck? The image: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" the word labels has strikethrough? It appears "labels" maybe struck? It says "incorrectly labels" maybe labels is struck? Let's inspect: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" The word labels appears with strikethrough? It might be "labels" struck? In corrected: "Please substitute page 4-2 with the attached page that includes the revised figure." No. Need maybe use ~~labels~~? But if existing text says incorrectly labels, maybe the error is that figure labels traveled way and roadway incorrectly? The errata might strike "labels"? The image: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" the word labels has a line through? It appears yes: "labels" maybe struck? Actually text: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" The word labels is underlined? Hmm. It might be "labels" with strikethrough because should be "label"? No. Let's not overmark unless clear. The image shows "labels" with strikethrough? It looks like "labels" has a line through? The OCR: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" The word labels maybe has strikethrough? It appears "labels" with line through? Could be. But if we mark wrong, content altered. Need faithful. Let's inspect visual: In row Chapter 4, Existing Text: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." The word "labels" appears with strikethrough? It is in bold? The line through maybe from underline? It says "incorrectly labels" maybe "labels" is struck? The corrected says substitute page. Maybe no strikethrough. Hard.

Row Chapter 5: blank? There is "Chapter 5" in Page column, no text? Need include row with empty cells? Could include

Chapter 5. But empty cells okay. Need maybe no content.

Row 6-13: Existing: "Under Sight Distance, the final subsection of Section 6.3.1, the final sentence references Tables 6-2 and 6-4." Corrected: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." Need strikethrough: "cross reference" maybe struck? In corrected: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The phrase "cross reference" maybe struck? It appears "cross reference" with strikethrough? Actually corrected text: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The words "cross reference" maybe struck? It might be "cross reference" underlined? In image: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The phrase "cross reference" appears struck? It has line through? It says "cross reference" maybe with strikethrough? Wait corrected text should change existing cross reference. Maybe existing references Tables 6-2 and 6-4; corrected says change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4. The phrase "cross reference" might be underlined? The image: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The words "cross reference" appear with strikethrough? It looks like "cross reference" has a line through? Actually maybe "cross reference" is struck because should be "cross-reference"? No. In existing: "references Tables 6-2 and 6-4." "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe struck? It appears "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe not? In corrected: "Tables 6-3 and 6-4" maybe underlined? Need mark changes: existing "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe struck? The image: "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe has strikethrough? It appears "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe not? Actually in existing: "references Tables 6-2 and 6-4." The "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe underlined? Hmm.

Row Chapter 9: blank? Page column Chapter 9, no text.

Row 9-12: Existing: "The design speeds shown in U.S. Customary units in Figure 9-18 are incorrect." Corrected: "Please substitute page 9-12 with the attached page that includes the revised figure." Need strikethrough: "Figure 9-18" maybe struck? It appears "Figure 9-18" with strikethrough? In existing: "Figure 9-18" maybe struck? It appears yes? Actually "Figure 9-18" maybe underlined? It says design speeds shown in U.S. Customary units in Figure 9-18 are incorrect. Maybe Figure 9-18 is struck? It appears "Figure 9-18" with strikethrough? The image: "Figure 9-18" maybe has line through? It might be underlined? In corrected no figure number.

Need maybe include copyright footer? Filter says page footer ignore. So omit.

Need ensure no continuous spaces. Use single spaces.

Need maybe table structure: The first row has no page number? Could be a continuation row from previous page? The table has Page column blank for first row. Could represent as

....... Then row 3-147, Chapter 4, 4-2? Wait Page column entries:

- blank (continuation)

- 3-147

- Chapter 4

- 4-2

- Chapter 5

- 6-13

- Chapter 9

- 9-12

Actually image: Page column: blank first, then 3-147, Chapter 4, 4-2, Chapter 5, 6-13, Chapter 9, 9-12. Yes.

Need table rows accordingly.

Need maybe use

for header. Table header: Page, Existing Text, Corrected Text. Use thead.

Need maybe use

? No.

Need maybe use

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

. Then table. Then page number.

Need check allowed tags: table, caption, thead, tbody, tfoot, tr, td, th, p, h2, strong, em, b, i, u, s, sup, sub, ol, ul, li, blockquote, span, pre, code, hr, br. No style. Classes only allowed. We can use class="formula" on p. class="align-center" on page number. No other classes.

Need maybe use ? Not needed.

Need formulas: Could use

L = V² / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as

. But formula class maybe for formula only; including text maybe okay. Could separate formula and text? In image formula line includes text to right. Could use

L = V² / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as

. Good.

Need maybe use for inline formula? Not necessary.

Need maybe preserve "U.S. Customary units" with period. Good.

Need maybe use "±" character. Allowed.

Need maybe use en dash in GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*? It has em dash? Use —. Good.

Need maybe use "300-m [1,000-ft]" hyphen. Good.

Need decide strikethrough/underline. Let's examine image more carefully. It is an errata table. Usually existing text has strikethrough for deleted, corrected text has underline for inserted. The image shows in Existing Text: [1,000 ft] struck, Figure 3-24 struck, 3.5 percent struck. Also [2,500 ft]? It appears [2,500 ft] maybe not struck? Wait existing first: "750 m [2,500 ft]" The [2,500 ft] maybe has strikethrough? It appears [2,500 ft] with line through? The line maybe under? Let's compare with [1,000 ft] which is clearly struck? In image: "300 m [1,000 ft] more" [1,000 ft] has strikethrough through middle. "750 m [2,500 ft]" maybe [2,500 ft] has strikethrough? It appears [2,500 ft] maybe not? Actually the line through [2,500 ft] maybe from underline? It might be struck because corrected to 2,700. In corrected: [2,700 ft] appears underlined? It has line under? Yes likely. [3,500 ft] existing struck, [3,700 ft] corrected underlined. Figure 3-24 existing struck, Figure 3-25 corrected underlined? It appears Figure 3-25 maybe underlined? The text "Figure 3-25" maybe has underline? It looks maybe not, but likely. 3.5 percent existing struck, 5.5 percent corrected underlined? It appears 5.5 percent maybe underlined? yes.

Equation row: Existing "Equation 3-39 is shown as" maybe "Equation 3-39" underlined? Actually corrected says Please change Equation 3-39 to read. Maybe no changes in equation number, only formulas? The formulas in existing and corrected look same? Wait existing formulas: L = V^2 / 254(R ± G) for Metric and as L = V^2 / 30(R ± G) for U.S. Customary units. Corrected: L = V^2 / 254(R ± G) for Metric units and L = V^2 / 30(R ± G) for U.S. Customary units. Difference: existing says "and as", corrected says "and". Maybe no strikethrough. But image: Existing formula denominator maybe [254(R ± G)]? Corrected same. Maybe no marks.

Chapter 4: Existing "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." The word "labels" maybe struck? Actually if figure incorrectly labels, maybe the error is that it labels traveled way and roadway? Corrected says substitute page. Maybe no strikethrough. But image: "labels" appears with strikethrough? It might be because "labels" is wrong word? Could be "labels" struck and corrected? But corrected doesn't provide replacement text, just substitute page. In errata, existing text may have strikethrough on "labels"? Let's inspect: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way" The word labels has a line through? It appears "labels" maybe underlined? The line through could be strikethrough. If so, use ~~labels~~. But then sentence becomes "Figure 4-1 incorrectly the traveled way" weird. Maybe the strikethrough is on "incorrectly"? It says "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels" maybe "incorrectly" struck? The image: "incorrectly" maybe not. Hmm.

Maybe the table is errata: Existing Text column shows original text with errors marked by strikethrough? Corrected Text column shows corrected text with underlines? For Chapter 4, existing: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." Maybe the error is that the figure labels are wrong, not text. They might strike "labels"? But corrected says substitute page, no text. Could be no marks.

6-13: Existing: "Under Sight Distance, the final subsection of Section 6.3.1, the final sentence references Tables 6-2 and 6-4." Corrected: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." In corrected, "cross reference" maybe struck? Actually maybe "cross reference" should be "cross-reference"? The image: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The phrase "cross reference" appears with strikethrough? It might be because "cross reference" is underlined? Let's look: It says "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The words "cross reference" have a line through? It appears "cross reference" maybe struck? If corrected text has strikethrough, weird. Maybe existing "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" is struck, corrected "Tables 6-3 and 6-4" underlined. In image existing: "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe underlined? It appears "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" maybe not struck? Actually the line under "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" could be underline? It is at bottom? The text "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" appears with underline? It might be underlined in existing? Hmm.

9-12: Existing: "The design speeds shown in U.S. Customary units in Figure 9-18 are incorrect." The phrase "Figure 9-18" maybe struck? It appears "Figure 9-18" with strikethrough? It might be underlined? In corrected no figure. Maybe existing figure number is wrong? But corrected says substitute page, not change figure number. Maybe no marks.

Need not overdo marks if uncertain. But if image clearly has strikethrough, should include. Let's identify clear strikethroughs from visual:

- Existing: [1,000 ft] has strikethrough (line through middle). Yes.

- Existing: Figure 3-24 has strikethrough? It appears "Figure 3-24" with line through? Yes likely.

- Existing: 3.5 percent has strikethrough? Yes line through 3.5? It appears "3.5 percent" with line through 3.5? yes.

- Existing: [2,500 ft]? It appears [2,500 ft] maybe not? Let's compare: In first existing line: "750 m [2,500 ft]" The [2,500 ft] maybe has strikethrough? The line through maybe from underline? It appears [2,500 ft] with line through? I think yes because corrected [2,700 ft] underlined. Use ~~[2,500 ft]~~.

- Existing: [3,500 ft] likely struck. Use ~~[3,500 ft]~~.

- Corrected: [2,700 ft] underlined? Use [2,700 ft].

- Corrected: [3,700 ft] underlined? Use [3,700 ft].

- Corrected: Figure 3-25 underlined? Use Figure 3-25.

- Corrected: 5.5 percent underlined? Use 5.5 percent.

- Corrected: [1,000-ft]? Maybe not underlined? It might be inserted? Existing had [1,000 ft] struck, corrected has [1,000-ft] maybe not marked? It is same value but hyphenated. Could be underlined? It appears [1,000-ft] maybe not. Leave plain.

- Corrected: "entering speed is 60 km/h [35 mph], the speed at the end of a 300-m [1,000-ft] climb is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. This is determined by starting on the curve for a 6 percent grade corresponding to 60 km/h [35 mph] for which the distance is 750 m [2,700 ft], and proceeding along it to the point where the distance is 300 m [1,000 ft] more, or 1050 m [3,700 ft], for which the speed is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. Figure 3-25 shows..." Wait corrected has [1,000 ft] not hyphen? It says "300 m [1,000 ft] more" maybe [1,000 ft] not struck? In corrected: "300 m [1,000 ft] more" appears [1,000 ft] maybe not struck. Good.

Equation row: Maybe existing "Equation 3-39" underlined? In image: "Equation 3-39 is shown as" maybe "Equation 3-39" has underline? It appears maybe underlined? Corrected: "Please change Equation 3-39 to read" maybe "Equation 3-39" underlined? Could be because equation number is correct? Not sure. Leave plain.

Chapter 4: Maybe "labels" struck? Let's inspect: The word "labels" in existing appears with strikethrough? It is in middle of line: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way". The line through "labels" maybe yes. But if we use ~~labels~~, it indicates deletion. Corrected doesn't replace. Could be original text had "labels" but should be "label"? The corrected page includes revised figure, not text. Maybe the existing text itself is a note? Hmm. Maybe the table is errata: Existing Text column is the text in the manual that is wrong. Corrected Text column is replacement. For Chapter 4, existing text: "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." This is not a manual text? It is an errata entry describing error. It might not have strikethrough. The word "labels" might be underlined? Actually maybe "labels" is underlined because it's the error? The image: "incorrectly labels" the word labels has underline? It appears line under labels? Could be underline. Allowed u. But not sure.

Maybe the table is from AASHTO errata: It lists "Page", "Existing Text", "Corrected Text". Existing Text often shows original text with strikethrough for deleted and underline for inserted? Actually the "Existing Text" column may show the text as it appears, with errors underlined? The "Corrected Text" column shows corrected text with underlines for changes? In the first row, existing text has strikethrough on wrong values, corrected text has underline on corrected values. So yes.

For Chapter 4, existing text might have "labels" underlined? It says "Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way and the roadway." Maybe the error is that the figure labels are wrong, so the text itself is not being corrected? The corrected text says substitute page. Maybe no marks.

For 6-13, existing: "references Tables 6-2 and 6-4." The "Tables 6-2 and 6-4" likely underlined? Or struck? Corrected: "Please change this cross reference to Tables 6-3 and 6-4." The "cross reference" maybe underlined? Hmm.

Need maybe use for underlines in corrected. If uncertain, maybe avoid marking underlines except clear first row. But if image has underlines, not marking loses formatting. But content rules say preserve formatting? It says title, paragraphs, lists, tables, formulas, figure captions. It doesn't explicitly require strikethrough/underline, but allowed tags. OCR should faithful. Use where clear.
Need maybe use for bold? Header table maybe bold? Not necessary.
Need maybe use for italic? "U.S. Customary units" maybe italic? In image, "Metric units" and "U.S. Customary units" maybe italic? It appears "Metric units" maybe italic? In formula line: "for the Metric units and as" Metric units maybe italic? "U.S. Customary units" maybe italic? Could use for italic. But not necessary? OCR engine should preserve emphasis if visible. The image shows "Metric units" and "U.S. Customary units" in italic? It looks maybe italic? In formula row: "for the Metric units and as" the words Metric units appear italic? Yes maybe. "for the U.S. Customary units" italic. In corrected: "for the Metric units and" italic, "for the U.S. Customary units." italic. Could use Metric units, U.S. Customary units. Also "Sight Distance" maybe italic? In 6-13: "Under Sight Distance," maybe Sight Distance italic? It appears maybe italic? Could use Sight Distance. "U.S. Customary units" in 9-12 maybe italic? It appears maybe italic? Could use em. But overuse? Allowed. Need not if uncertain.
Need maybe preserve "Chapter 4" etc as page column. Good.

Need maybe table cells with multiple paragraphs. Use
inside td. For first row, two paragraphs? Existing text one paragraph. Corrected one paragraph. Use
...
. For formula row, use
Equation...
then formula p. Good.

Need ensure no blank lines? Fine.

Potential issue: The output must start with
. If we include header as h2, then table. End with page number. Good.
Need maybe no
because no title. But table without caption okay.
Need maybe use
only. Good.
Need maybe use
with no attributes. Good.
Need maybe use
inside formula? No.

Need maybe use
for each formula. But formula includes text after fraction. Could be okay. Could separate:
L = V² / [254(R ± G)]
for the Metric units and as
. But image has formula and text on same line. The formula class for independent formula; if text on same line, maybe not independent. But allowed. Could use
L = V² / [254(R ± G)] for the Metric units and as
. Good.
Need maybe use
for formula? No, formula class. Need maybe use for fraction? Not needed. Need maybe use ² after V. Good. Need maybe use "V²" no space. Need maybe use "R ± G" with spaces. Good. Need maybe use brackets [] not parentheses? Image uses [254(R ± G)]? It shows L = V^2 / [254(R ± G)]? The denominator appears 254(R ± G) with brackets? It shows "254(R ± G)" maybe no square brackets? In image: L = V^2 / 254(R ± G) maybe with parentheses? It appears "2

最小直线渐变长度PDF 第 2 页 · 原页码 2

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

Page	Existing Text	Corrected Text
Chapter 2
2-13	Two dimensions of the Intercity Bus (BUS-12 [BUS-40]) in Figure 2-4 were “rounded up” to the tenth decimal in the U.S. Customary unit measurements. For the sake of accuracy, the current measurements of 7.49 m [23.3 ft] and 1.93 m [6.3 ft] should be changed to 7.09 m [23.25 ft] and 1.93 m [6.25 ft], respectively.	Please substitute page 2-13 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.
2-14	The dimensions for the back overhang of the Intercity Bus (BUS-14 [BUS-45]) in Figure 2-5 are incorrect. The current measurement of the back overhang (2.12 m [7.0 ft]) should be changed to 2.67 m [8.8 ft].	Please substitute page 2-14 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.
2-25	All double-trailer combination design vehicles (WB-30D [WB-67D]) depicted in Figure 2-16 should be 5-axle trucks.	Please substitute page 2-25 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.
2-28	All turnpike-double combination design vehicles (WB-33D [WB-109D]) depicted in Figure 2-19 should be 9-axle trucks.	Please substitute page 2-28 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.
2-35	In Figure 2-25, the legends in both the SI and the U.S. Customary unit graphs list the Minimum Braking Distance as X = Wet Pavement and Y = Dry Pavement.	These representations should be reversed so that X = Dry Pavement and Y = Wet Pavement.
Chapter 3
3-7	For the 70 km/h design speed in Table 3-3, the Decision Sight Distance for Maneuver B is listed as 325 m.	Please change “325 m” to “235 m.”
3-12	Item 4 refers to a PC design vehicle.	Please change “PC design vehicle” to “P design vehicle.”
3-86	The second paragraph on page 3-86 refers to “for tangent lane widths, Wn”	Please change “tangent lane widths” to “tangent two-lane traveled way widths.”
3-87	Figure 3-17 should be updated.	Please substitute page 3-87 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.

最小直线渐变长度PDF 第 3 页 · 原页码 3

GDHS-6-E1—November 2013

Page	Existing Text	Corrected Text
3-88	Figure 3-18 should be updated.	Please substitute page 3-88 with the attached page that includes the revised figure.
3-92	The second sentence of the final paragraph on page 3-92 begins "The differences in track widths of the SU, WB-12, WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [SU, WB-40, WB-62, WB-67, WB-67D, WB-100T, and WB-109D] design trucks are substantial for the sharp curves associated with . . ."	Please change this sentence to read "The differences in track widths of the SU-9, SU-12, WB-12, WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D, WB-28D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [SU-30, SU-40, WB-40, WB-62, WB-67, WB-67D, WB-92D, WB-100T, and WB-109D] design trucks are substantial for the sharp curves associated with . . ."
3-94	The first note under Table 3-26b references the metric WB-19 design vehicle.	Please change this reference to the U.S. Customary design vehicle WB-62.
3-96	In the Radius of Curve column, the 2^nd row value is listed as 25000.	Please change "25000" to "2500."
3-99	The final sentence in the section about Case II begins "Case I widths for these longer vehicles, including the WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [WB-62, WB-65, WB-100T, and WB-109D] design vehicles, may . . ."	Please change this sentence to read "Case I widths for these longer vehicles, including the WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D, WB-28D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [WB-62, WB-67, WB-67D, WB-92D, WB-100T, and WB-109D] design vehicles, may . . ."
3 103	Bottom section of Table 3 29	For clarification, add a row below "Application of Modification for Edge Conditions" with the headings "Case I, Case II, and Case III" in columns 2, 3, and 4, respectively; repeat in columns 6, 7, and 8 respectively.
3 114	The final paragraph on page 3 114 reads "The effect of rate and length of grade on the speed of a typical heavy truck is shown in Figures 3 24 and 3 25. From Figure 3 24 it can be determined how far a truck, starting its climb from any speed up to approximately 120 km/h [70 mph], travels up various grades or combinations of grades before a certain or uniform speed is reached. For instance, with an entering speed of approximately 110 km/h [70 mph], the truck travels about 950 m [2,700 ft] up a 6 percent grade before its speed is reduced to 60 km/h [35 mph]. If the entering speed is 60 km/h [35 mph], the speed at the end of a 300 m [1,000 ft] climb is about	Please change this paragraph to read "The effect of rate and length of grade on the speed of a typical heavy truck is shown in Figures 3-24 and 3-25. From Figure 3-24 it can be determined how far a truck, starting its climb from any speed up to approximately 110 km/h [70 mph], travels up various grades or combinations of grades before a certain or uniform speed is reached. For instance, with an entering speed of approximately 110 km/h [70 mph], the truck travels about 750 m [2,700 ft] up a 6 percent grade before its speed is reduced to 60 km/h [35 mph]. If the