标准信息
STANDARD INFORMATION- 标准编号
- 2appendices_FF
- 所属分类
- 其他国外标准与工程资料
- 文件语言
- 英语
- 文件格式
- 文件页数
- 6 页
- 文件大小
- 2.11 MB
· 更新:
标准简介
OVERVIEW中文简介
标准 2appendices_FF 的预览内容
English summary
Preview of standard 2appendices_FF
以上为根据文件整理的内容简介。
标准内容预览
DOCUMENT PREVIEWTable FF.2. Inputs data requirements for new PCC and rehabilitation with PCC model calibration, continued.
| General Description | Variable | Rehabilitation Type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New JPCP | New CRCP | Existing JPCP Restoration | JPCP Overlays1 | CRCP Overlays2 | ||
| Rehabilitation | Existing distress—percent slabs with transverse cracks plus previously replaced slabs | ✓ | ||||
| Percent of slabs with repairs after restoration | ✓ | |||||
| Foundation support—modulus of subgrade reaction | ✓ | |||||
| Month modulus of subgrade reaction was measured | ✓ | |||||
6
Acknowledgment of Sponsorship
This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council.
Disclaimer
This is the final draft as submitted by the research agency. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the research agency. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, AASHTO, or the individual States participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research program.
Acknowledgements
The research team for NCHRP Project 1-37A: Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures consisted of Applied Research Associates, Inc., ERES Consultants Division (ARA-ERES) as the prime contractor with Arizona State University (ASU) as the primary subcontractor.
Data used in model calibration of the design procedures for new PCC pavements and the rehabilitation of existing pavements (all types) with PCC was assembled at ARA-ERES. The author of Appendix FF is Mr. Leslie Titus-Glover. Dr. Darter provided technical and managerial coordination, monitored progress, set schedules and deadlines, and provided periodic technical review of the assembled data. Mr. Joseph A. Stefanski assisted with the database assembly.
Foreword
The contents of this appendix are provided in support of PART 3, Chapters 4 and 7 and Appendices JJ – Joint Faulting in Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements, KK – Transverse Cracking in Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements, LL – Punchouts in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements, and NN – PCC Rehabilitation of Existing Pavements of the Design Guide. It presents a summary of the data used in model calibration of the design procedures for new PCC pavements and the rehabilitation of existing pavements (all types) with PCC. The Design Guide is limited to jointed plain concrete pavements (JPCP) and continuously reinforced concrete pavements (CRCP).
2
APPENDIX FF: CALIBRATION SECTIONS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document presents a summary of the data used in model calibration of the design procedures for new PCC pavements and the rehabilitation of existing pavements (all types) with PCC. The 2002 design guide is limited to jointed plain concrete pavements (JPCP) and continuously reinforced concrete pavements (CRCP). Sources of data used for model development, calibration, verification, and validation are summarized in table FF.1.
Table FF.1. Data sources for new PCC and rehabilitation with PCC model calibration.
| Design Type | Description | Distress Types | Data used in Model Calibration |
|---|---|---|---|
| New | JPCP | Transe joint faulting |
|
| Transe cracking | |||
| CRCP | Punchouts |
| |
| Rehabilitation | JPCP restoration | Transe joint faulting |
|
| Transe cracking | |||
| JPCP Overlays (over all types of existing pavements) | Transe joint faulting |
| |
| Transe cracking | |||
| CRCP Overlays (over all types of existing pavements) | Punchouts |
|
The key inputs required for model calibration are summarized in the next few sections of this appendix.
2.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION (NEW PCC AND REHABILITATION WITH PCC)
A summary of the input data used in model calibration is presented in table FF.2 and are categorized as follows:
- General information.
- Site/project identification.
3
Table FF.2. Inputs data requirements for new PCC and rehabilitation with PCC model calibration.
| General Description | Variable | Design Type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New JPCP | New CRCP | Existing JPCP Restoration | JPCP Overlays1 | CRCP Overlays2 | ||
| General information | Project name and description | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design life, years | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Existing pavement construction date | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Pavement overlay construction date | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Pavement restoration construction date | ✓ | |||||
| Traffic opening date | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Type of rehabilitation strategy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Site/project identification | Location of the project | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Project identification | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Functional class | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Analysis parameters | Analysis type (deterministic or probabilistic) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Initial smoothness (after rehabilitation) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Performance criteria | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Climate3 | Hourly profiles of temperature distribution through PCC slab | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hourly temperature and moisture profiles (including frost depth calculations) through the other pavement layers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Zero stress temperature for JPCP and CRCP | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Monthly or semi-monthly (during frozen or recently frozen periods) predictions of layer moduli for asphalt, unbound base/subbase, and subgrade layers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Mean annual freezing index, number of wet days, number of air freeze-thaw cycles | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Mean monthly relative humidity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Traffic | AADTT, percent trucks, vehicle speed, and others | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traffic volume adjustment factors | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Axle load adjustment factors | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Wheel location, traffic wander, and others | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
1. PCC bonded overlays of existing JPCP and JPCP overlays of existing flexible pavements.
2. PCC bonded overlays of existing CRCP and CRCP overlays of existing flexible pavements.
3. Note that the climatic inputs listed are generated using the Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model (EICM). The actual inputs required by EICM are presented later in this appendix.
4
Table FF.2. Inputs data requirements for new PCC and rehabilitation with PCC model calibration, continued.
| General Description | Variable | Design Type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New JPCP | New CRCP | Existing JPCP Restoration | JPCP Overlays1 | CRCP Overlays2 | |||
| FF.3 | Drainage and surface properties | Pavement surface layer (PCC) shortwave absorptivity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Potential for infiltration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Pavement cross slope | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Length of drainage path | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Layer definition and material properties | Layer number, description, and material type | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Layer thickness | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Elastic modulus | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Flexural, compressive, and tensile strength | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Ultimate shrinkage | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Unit weight, Poisson's ratio | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Coefficient of thermal expansion | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Thermal conductivity, heat capacity, etc. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Design features | Permanent curl/warp (effective temperature difference) in PCC slab due to construction curling and moisture warping | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Transverse joint spacing (average or random) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Transverse joint sealant type | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Dowel diameter and spacing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Edge support (tied PCC, widened lane, slab width, etc.) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Lane-shoulder joint load transfer efficiency (LTE) (for tied PCC shoulders) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Slab width (for widened slabs) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Number of years after which PCC/base interface is unbonded Nunbond (for JPCP with a stabilized base) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Base erodibility index | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Total longitudinal steel cross-sectional area as percent of PCC slab cross-sectional area | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Diameter of longitudinal reinforcing steel | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Depth of steel placement from pavement surface | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| PCC slab/base friction coefficient | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Crack spacing (mean and standard deviation) | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
5
Table FF.2. Inputs data requirements for new PCC and rehabilitation with PCC model calibration, continued.
| General Description | Variable | Rehabilitation Type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New JPCP | New CRCP | Existing JPCP Restoration | JPCP Overlays1 | CRCP Overlays2 | ||
| Rehabilitation | Existing distress—percent slabs with transverse cracks plus previously replaced slabs | ✓ | ||||
| Percent of slabs with repairs after restoration | ✓ | |||||
| Foundation support—modulus of subgrade reaction | ✓ | |||||
| Month modulus of subgrade reaction was measured | ✓ | |||||
6
预览内容由文件识别整理,表格、公式及文字请以原始文件为准。
原文图片预览
PAGE IMAGES下载标准文件
2appendices_FF
英语 · PDF · 6 页 · 2.11 MB



