ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification f
ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials
ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials
标准信息
STANDARD INFORMATION- 标准编号
- ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification f
- 所属分类
- ACI 美国混凝土学会标准
- 文件语言
- 英语
- 文件格式
- 文件页数
- 6 页
- 文件大小
- 324.24 KB
· 更新:
标准简介
OVERVIEW中文简介
标准 ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials 的预览内容
English summary
Preview of standard ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials
以上为根据文件整理的内容简介。
标准内容预览
DOCUMENT PREVIEWThe user wants me to convert an OCR image of an engineering standard PDF page into an HTML fragment.
Let me analyze the page carefully.
The page header says "117R-6" on the left and "ACI COMMITTEE REPORT" on the right. These are headers/footers and should be ignored per the rules.
The page contains:
1. Figures (Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a), Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b), Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)) - these are images, so I should ignore the images themselves but output the figure captions.
2. Text content in two columns.
Let me transcribe the text content.
Left column:
- Figure captions:
- "Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a)"
- "Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment"
- Section heading: "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions"
- Paragraph: "If the level and cross-sectional dimension tolerances are given, then a suspended (elevated) slab is fully tolerated."
- Example paragraph: "Example: 12 in. slab—The envelope for the slab element extends 3/4 in. above the specified surface elevation to 1/4 in. below the specified soffit elevation. Thus the slab surface and/or soffit can be 3/4 in. higher or lower than specified. The slab thickness can be 3/8 in. greater or 1/4 in. less than specified; the rate of change in slope of the top surface is tolerated by the F_L, and the soffit is tolerated by the relative alignment and formed surface tolerances. See Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)."
- Paragraph: "The acceptable elevation envelope of the slab surface and soffit is ± 3/4 in. The rate of change of the adjacent surface elevation points within the acceptable elevation is governed by specification Section 4.5.5."
- Section heading: "4.5.5 Floor profile finish quality has traditionally been measured by limiting the gap to be measured under either a freestanding or leveled 10-ft straightedge, according to the specifier's requirements. The technology for measuring floor profiles has rapidly evolved in response to the needs of random vehicular traffic industrial users. This technology provides a welcome alternative and a solution to the generally recognized inadequacies of the 10-ft straightedge to describe"
Right column:
- Figure caption: "Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—Level and relative alignment cross-sectional dimension"
- Paragraph (continuation): "and define floor surfaces. It is not the intention of the ACI 117 specification to limit floor finish measurement technology to that currently available. As new technology is developed, improved, and perfected, specifiers may consider utilizing alternate techniques for specifying and measuring floor finish tolerances. Random sampling and statistical analysis is particularly appropriate for high-performance floors or portions of floors where irregularities must be rigidly controlled."
- Paragraph: "The specifying of narrow aisle warehouse floors with defined traffic lanes requires specialized techniques not addressed in this specification."
- Section heading: "4.5.6 The F_F-F_L system set forth in Section 4.5.6 of this specification provides the specifier, contractor, and owner with a convenient and precise method of communication, measurement, and determination of compliance of the floor surfaces required and achieved, using the procedures set forth in ASTM E 1155. Floor profile quality has traditionally been specified by limiting the size of the gap to be observed under a freestanding or leveled 10 ft long straightedge. However, recent improvements in floor profile measurement technology have surpassed all variations of this "gap-under-the-straightedge" format.¹"
- Paragraph: "F-numbers provide a convenient means for specifying the local floor profile in statistical terms. Two distinct profile variables are controlled:"
- List:
- "The 12 in. incremental curvature q measures the local flatness of the floor. See Fig. 4.5.6(a)."
- "The 120 in. elevation difference d measures the local levelness of the floor. See Fig. 4.5.6(b)."
- Paragraph: "The required data may be gathered by several methods, including measurements taken from leveled straightedges, optical levels, and instruments developed for this purpose."
Now let me think about the layout. The page has two columns. The figures are at the top. The text flows in two columns.
For the two-column layout, I should use the layout-columns table approach. But actually, the figures are at the top spanning both columns, and the text is in two columns below.
Let me think about how to structure this. The figures are at the top. Then below the figures, there's two-column text.
Actually, looking more carefully, the figures are in the top portion. The left column has two figures stacked, and the right column has one figure. Then below the figures, the text starts in two columns.
Hmm, but the text in the left column starts with the section heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" which is below the left figures. The right column text starts with "and define floor surfaces..." which is a continuation from the left column's last paragraph.
So the reading order is: left column top to bottom, then right column top to bottom. But the right column's first paragraph is a continuation of the left column's last paragraph.
For OCR purposes, I think the best approach is to present the content in reading order. Since this is a two-column layout, I'll use the layout-columns table to represent the two columns.
Actually, let me reconsider. The figures are at the top. The left column has figures then text. The right column has a figure then text. The text in the right column continues from the left column.
I think the cleanest approach for OCR is to use a two-column layout table where the left cell contains the left column content (figures captions + text) and the right cell contains the right column content (figure caption + text).
But wait - the figures themselves should be ignored, only captions output. So the left cell would have the two figure captions and then the text. The right cell would have the figure caption and then the text.
Let me structure it:
|
Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a) Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensionsIf the level and cross-sectional dimension tolerances are given, then a suspended (elevated) slab is fully tolerated. Example: 12 in. slab—The envelope for the slab element extends 3/4 in. above the specified surface elevation to 1/4 in. below the specified soffit elevation. Thus the slab surface and/or soffit can be 3/4 in. higher or lower than specified. The slab thickness can be 3/8 in. greater or 1/4 in. less than specified; the rate of change in slope of the top surface is tolerated by the FL, and the soffit is tolerated by the relative alignment and formed surface tolerances. See Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c). The acceptable elevation envelope of the slab surface and soffit is ± 3/4 in. The rate of change of the adjacent surface elevation points within the acceptable elevation is governed by specification Section 4.5.5. 4.5.5Floor profile finish quality has traditionally been measured by limiting the gap to be measured under either a freestanding or leveled 10-ft straightedge, according to the specifier's requirements. The technology for measuring floor profiles has rapidly evolved in response to the needs of random vehicular traffic industrial users. This technology provides a welcome alternative and a solution to the generally recognized inadequacies of the 10-ft straightedge to describe |
Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—Level and relative alignment cross-sectional dimension and define floor surfaces. It is not the intention of the ACI 117 specification to limit floor finish measurement technology to that currently available. As new technology is developed, improved, and perfected, specifiers may consider utilizing alternate techniques for specifying and measuring floor finish tolerances. Random sampling and statistical analysis is particularly appropriate for high-performance floors or portions of floors where irregularities must be rigidly controlled. The specifying of narrow aisle warehouse floors with defined traffic lanes requires specialized techniques not addressed in this specification. 4.5.6The FF-FL system set forth in Section 4.5.6 of this specification provides the specifier, contractor, and owner with a convenient and precise method of communication, measurement, and determination of compliance of the floor surfaces required and achieved, using the procedures set forth in ASTM E 1155. Floor profile quality has traditionally been specified by limiting the size of the gap to be observed under a freestanding or leveled 10 ft long straightedge. However, recent improvements in floor profile measurement technology have surpassed all variations of this "gap-under-the-straightedge" format.1 F-numbers provide a convenient means for specifying the local floor profile in statistical terms. Two distinct profile variables are controlled:
The required data may be gathered by several methods, including measurements taken from leveled straightedges, optical levels, and instruments developed for this purpose. |
Wait, but the section headings "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" and "4.5.5" and "4.5.6" - these are section headings. The "4.5.5" and "4.5.6" are inline with the paragraph text (the heading number is at the start of the paragraph). Looking at the image, "4.5.5" is bold and at the start of the paragraph, and "4.5.6" is bold and at the start of the paragraph. These are run-in headings.
For run-in headings, I could use 4.5.5 at the start of the paragraph, or use h3. Looking at the visual hierarchy, "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" is a standalone heading (bold, on its own line). "4.5.5" and "4.5.6" are run-in headings (bold number followed by text on the same line).
For run-in headings, I'll use within the paragraph. Actually, let me look at the image again. "4.5.5" appears bold and then the text follows on the same line. Similarly "4.5.6". So these are run-in headings.
For the standalone heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions", this is a section heading. Since this is page 1 (well, it's a page in the middle of a document, but the rule says "每页输出必须以 Hmm, the rule says "每页输出必须以 So the first heading element would be the section heading. But it's inside the layout-columns table. Hmm, that's a problem because the page must start with h2. Let me reconsider the structure. Maybe I should not use layout-columns and instead just output the content in reading order (left column then right column). That way the first heading can be h2 at the top level. Actually, looking at the page layout more carefully: the figures are at the top, then the text is in two columns. The reading order for a two-column page is typically left column top-to-bottom, then right column top-to-bottom. But the right column's first paragraph is a continuation of the left column's last paragraph. I think for OCR fidelity, using the two-column layout is appropriate. But the h2 requirement... Let me think. Actually, maybe I can put the h2 heading before the table. The heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" appears in the left column. But if I put it before the table, it would be at the top of the page, which is roughly where it appears (below the figures). Hmm, but the figures are above the heading in the left column. If I ignore the figures and just output captions, the captions would come before the heading. Let me think about this differently. The page structure from top to bottom: - Top: figures (left has 2 figures, right has 1 figure) - Below figures: two-column text The figure captions are at the bottom of each figure. So in the left column, the captions are interspersed with the figures. In the right column, the caption is below the figure. I think the most faithful representation would be: 1. First, the figure captions (since figures are ignored, just captions) 2. Then the two-column text But the captions in the left column are between the two figures, and the right column caption is below the right figure. Actually, let me just use the layout-columns table and put everything in it. For the h2 requirement, I can make the first heading in the left cell an h2. But the rule says "每页输出必须以 Hmm, let me re-read: "每页输出必须以 OK so I need to restructure. Let me put the section heading as h2 before the table. But the heading is in the left column, below the figures... Actually, you know what, I think the practical approach is: since the figures are at the top and we're ignoring them (just outputting captions), and the first actual text heading is the section heading, I'll structure it as: 1. Figure captions first (as small notes or centered paragraphs) 2. Then the h2 heading 3. Then the two-column text Wait, but that changes the reading order. The figure captions in the left column come before the heading, and the right column caption comes before the right column text. Let me look at the visual layout again. In the left column: - Figure 1 (top) - Caption "Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a)" - Figure 2 (middle) - Caption "Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment" - Heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—..." - Text paragraphs In the right column: - Figure (top) - Caption "Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—..." - Text paragraphs (continuation) So the reading order within each column is: figure captions, then heading/text. I think the best approach for the h2 requirement is to use the layout-columns table but somehow have the h2 at the start. That's not possible if the table is first. Alternative: Don't use layout-columns. Just output everything in reading order (left column content, then right column content). This way: 1. h2 heading (but wait, the figure captions come before the heading in the left column) Hmm. The figure captions come before the heading. So the first element would be a figure caption, not h2. OK let me think about this more pragmatically. The rule says the page must start with h2. The figure captions are not headings. So I need to either: (a) Put the h2 heading first, then the figure captions and text (b) Accept that figure captions come first and violate the rule I think option (a) is better for compliance. The heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" is the main section heading for this page's content. I'll put it as h2 first. Then I'll use the layout-columns table for the rest. Actually wait, let me reconsider. Maybe I should just not use layout-columns and output in a linear reading order. The two-column layout is a visual artifact of the PDF. For OCR purposes, linear reading order (left column then right column) is often preferred. Let me go with linear reading order: 1. h2: "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" Wait, but the figure captions come before this heading visually. Hmm. Actually, you know what, I think the figure captions being before the heading is fine. Let me just put the figure captions first as centered paragraphs, then the h2 heading. But that violates the "must start with h2" rule. OK, I'll make a judgment call. The "must start with h2" rule is about the page's main heading. The figure captions are ancillary. I'll put the h2 heading first, then the figure captions, then the text. This is a reasonable interpretation. Actually, let me look at this from a different angle. In many OCR outputs of two-column pages, the figures at the top are treated as floating elements. The text content starts with the heading. The figure captions are placed near where the figures appear. Let me just go with this structure: Then the figure captions and text in a two-column layout. Hmm, but the heading is in the left column, below the left figures. If I put it first, then the figure captions would come after, which is wrong order. You know what, I think I'm overthinking this. Let me just use the layout-columns table and put the h2 inside the left cell. The rule says "每页输出必须以 Let me try yet another approach. What if I put the figure captions as small-note or centered paragraphs before the table, and then the h2 heading... no, that still doesn't start with h2. OK final decision: I'll put the h2 heading first (it's the main section heading for this page), then use the layout-columns table for the figure captions and text. The figure captions will be in the table cells. This slightly reorders things but satisfies the h2-first rule. Actually, I just realized - maybe I should look at whether the heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—..." is really the first heading. Looking at the image, yes, it's the first heading on the page. The figures don't have headings. Let me go with: Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a) Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment If the level and cross-sectional dimension tolerances are given, then a suspended (elevated) slab is fully tolerated. Example: 12 in. slab—The envelope for the slab element extends 3/4 in. above the specified surface elevation to 1/4 in. below the specified soffit elevation. Thus the slab surface and/or soffit can be 3/4 in. higher or lower than specified. The slab thickness can be 3/8 in. greater or 1/4 in. less than specified; the rate of change in slope of the top surface is tolerated by the FL, and the soffit is tolerated by the relative alignment and formed surface tolerances. See Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c). The acceptable elevation envelope of the slab surface and soffit is ± 3/4 in. The rate of change of the adjacent surface elevation points within the acceptable elevation is governed by specification Section 4.5.5. 4.5.5 Floor profile finish quality has traditionally been measured by limiting the gap to be measured under either a freestanding or leveled 10-ft straightedge, according to the specifier's requirements. The technology for measuring floor profiles has rapidly evolved in response to the needs of random vehicular traffic industrial users. This technology provides a welcome alternative and a solution to the generally recognized inadequacies of the 10-ft straightedge to describe Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—Level and relative alignment cross-sectional dimension and define floor surfaces. It is not the intention of the ACI 117 specification to limit floor finish measurement technology to that currently available. As new technology is developed, improved, and perfected, specifiers may consider utilizing alternate techniques for specifying and measuring floor finish tolerances. Random sampling and statistical analysis is particularly appropriate for high-performance floors or portions of floors where irregularities must be rigidly controlled. The specifying of narrow aisle warehouse floors with defined traffic lanes requires specialized techniques not addressed in this specification. 4.5.6 The FF-FL system set forth in Section 4.5.6 of this specification provides the specifier, contractor, and owner with a convenient and precise method of communication, measurement, and determination of compliance of the floor surfaces required and achieved, using the procedures set forth in ASTM E 1155. Floor profile quality has traditionally been specified by limiting the size of the gap to be observed under a freestanding or leveled 10 ft long straightedge. However, recent improvements in floor profile measurement technology have surpassed all variations of this "gap-under-the-straightedge" format.1 F-numbers provide a convenient means for specifying the local floor profile in statistical terms. Two distinct profile variables are controlled: The required data may be gathered by several methods, including measurements taken from leveled straightedges, optical levels, and instruments developed for this purpose. 6 Wait, but the h2 heading is inside the left column visually. By putting it before the table, I'm moving it to the top of the page. That's a bit odd but acceptable. Hmm, actually, let me reconsider whether to use layout-columns at all. The problem with layout-columns is that the text flows between columns (the right column's first paragraph continues the left column's last paragraph). With layout-columns, this continuation is preserved within the table structure, which is fine. But actually, I realize there might be an issue with the h2 being outside the table while the heading visually belongs to the left column. Let me just accept this minor reordering. Actually, wait. Let me reconsider the whole layout. Maybe I should NOT use layout-columns and instead just output everything linearly. The two-column layout in the PDF is just for space efficiency. The reading order is left column then right column. If I output linearly: 1. Left column: figure captions, heading, paragraphs 2. Right column: figure caption, paragraphs But the right column's first paragraph "and define floor surfaces..." is a continuation of the left column's last paragraph "...the 10-ft straightedge to describe". So in linear order, it would read: "...the 10-ft straightedge to describe and define floor surfaces..." which is correct! So linear reading order actually preserves the text flow correctly. Let me go with linear order. But then the figure captions in the right column would come after all the left column text, which is a bit odd but acceptable. Hmm, but the right column figure caption "Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—..." should ideally come before the right column text. In linear order (left column then right column), it would be: Left column: captions, heading, paragraphs Right column: caption, paragraphs That's fine. The right column caption comes before the right column text. OK let me go with linear order. This also makes it easier to satisfy the h2-first rule... wait, no. The figure captions in the left column come before the heading. So the first element would be a figure caption, not h2. Ugh. OK, I'll put the h2 heading first, then the figure captions, then the text. Let me just do that. Actually, you know what, let me look at the image one more time. The heading "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions" - is it really below the figures? Yes, it is. The figures are at the top of the page, and the heading is below them in the left column. For the h2-first rule, I'll put the heading first. The figure captions will follow. This is a minor reordering that I think is acceptable. Let me finalize: Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a) Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment If the level and cross-sectional dimension tolerances are given, then a suspended (elevated) slab is fully tolerated. Example: 12 in. slab—The envelope for the slab element extends 3/4 in. above the specified surface elevation to 1/4 in. below the specified soffit elevation. Thus the slab surface and/or soffit can be 3/4 in. higher or lower than specified. The slab thickness can be 3/8 in. greater or 1/4 in. less than specified; the rate of change in slope of the top surface is tolerated by the FL, and the soffit is tolerated by the relative alignment and formed surface tolerances. See Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c). The acceptable elevation envelope of the slab surface and soffit is ± 3/4 in. The rate of change of the adjacent surface elevation points within the acceptable elevation is governed by specification Section 4.5.5. 4.5.5 Floor profile finish quality has traditionally been measured by limiting the gap to be measured under either a freestanding or leveled 10-ft straightedge, according to the specifier's requirements. The technology for measuring floor profiles has rapidly evolved in response to the needs of random vehicular traffic industrial users. This technology provides a welcome alternative and a solution to the generally recognized inadequacies of the 10-ft straightedge to describe Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—Level and relative alignment cross-sectional dimension and define floor surfaces. It is not the intention of the ACI 117 specification to limit floor finish measurement technology to that currently available. As new technology is developed, improved, and perfected, specifiers may consider utilizing alternate techniques for specifying and measuring floor finish tolerances. Random sampling and statistical analysis is particularly appropriate for high-performance floors or portions of floors where irregularities must be rigidly controlled. The specifying of narrow aisle warehouse floors with defined traffic lanes requires specialized techniques not addressed in this specification. 4.5.6 The FF-FL system set forth in Section 4.5.6 of this specification provides the specifier, contractor, and owner with a convenient and precise method of communication, measurement, and determination of compliance of the floor surfaces required and achieved, using the procedures set forth in ASTM E 1155. Floor profile quality has traditionally been specified by limiting the size of the gap to be observed under a freestanding or leveled 10 ft long straightedge. However, recent improvements in floor profile measurement technology have surpassed all variations of this "gap-under-the-straightedge" format.1 F-numbers provide a convenient means for specifying the local floor profile in statistical terms. Two distinct profile variables are controlled: The required data may be gathered by several methods, including measurements taken from leveled straightedges, optical levels, and instruments developed for this purpose. 6 Hmm wait, but this loses the two-column layout. The right column figure caption "Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—..." appears in the middle of the text flow (between the left column's last paragraph and the right column's first paragraph). In the linear reading order, this is actually correct: the right column caption comes before the right column text. But visually, the right column caption is at the top of the right column, not in the middle of the page. By putting it in the linear flow between the left column's last paragraph and the right column's first paragraph, it ends up in the middle of the output. That's a bit odd but acceptable for OCR. Actually, I think using layout-columns would be more faithful to the visual layout. Let me reconsider. With layout-columns: - Left cell: figure captions, heading, paragraphs (left column content) - Right cell: figure caption, paragraphs (right column content) The h2 heading would be inside the left cell. But the rule says the output must start with h2. If the table is the first element, the output starts with Hmm, unless I put the h2 before the table. But the h2 is visually inside the left column, below the figures. OK, I think the cleanest solution that satisfies the h2-first rule AND preserves the two-column layout is: Put the h2 heading before the table (as a page-level heading), then use the table for the two-column content (figure captions + text). The heading being outside the table is a minor structural choice. Let me go with that: Fig. 4.1(a) and 4.5.3(a) Fig. 4.1(a), (b) and 4.5.3(a), (b)—Vertical and relative alignment If the level and cross-sectional dimension tolerances are given, then a suspended (elevated) slab is fully tolerated. Example: 12 in. slab—The envelope for the slab element extends 3/4 in. above the specified surface elevation to 1/4 in. below the specified soffit elevation. Thus the slab surface and/or soffit can be 3/4 in. higher or lower than specified. The slab thickness can be 3/8 in. greater or 1/4 in. less than specified; the rate of change in slope of the top surface is tolerated by the FL, and the soffit is tolerated by the relative alignment and formed surface tolerances. See Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c). The acceptable elevation envelope of the slab surface and soffit is ± 3/4 in. The rate of change of the adjacent surface elevation points within the acceptable elevation is governed by specification Section 4.5.5. 4.5.5 Floor profile finish quality has traditionally been measured by limiting the gap to be measured under either a freestanding or leveled 10-ft straightedge, according to the specifier's requirements. The technology for measuring floor profiles has rapidly evolved in response to the needs of random vehicular traffic industrial users. This technology provides a welcome alternative and a solution to the generally recognized inadequacies of the 10-ft straightedge to describe Fig. 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5.3(c)—Level and relative alignment cross-sectional dimension and define floor surfaces. It is not the intention of the ACI 117 specification to limit floor finish measurement technology to that currently available. As new technology is developed, improved, and perfected, specifiers may consider utilizing alternate techniques for specifying and measuring floor finish tolerances. Random sampling and statistical analysis is particularly appropriate for high-performance floors or portions of floors where irregularities must be rigidly controlled. The specifying of narrow aisle warehouse floors with defined traffic lanes requires specialized techniques not addressed in this specification. 4.5.6 The FF-FL system set forth in Section 4.5.6 of this specification provides the specifier, contractor, and owner with a convenient and precise method of communication, measurement, and determination of compliance of the floor surfaces required and achieved, using the procedures set forth in ASTM E 1155. Floor profile quality has traditionally been specified by limiting the size of the gap to be observed under a freestanding or leveled 10 ft long straightedge. However, recent improvements in floor profile measurement technology have surpassed all variations of this "gap-under-the-straightedge" format.1 F-numbers provide a convenient means for specifying the local floor profile in statistical terms. Two distinct profile variables are controlled: The required
开头"), I need to start with h2.
开头(页面内标题)". So the first heading on the page should be h2. The first heading on this page is "4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions". But wait, the figures come first. The figures are at the top. But figures are images and we only output captions. The captions are not headings.
开头" - the output must start with h2. If the table is the first element, that violates the rule.
开头(页面内标题)". So the very first element of the output must be an h2.
4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions
开头" but maybe having the table first with h2 as the first heading inside is acceptable? No, the rule is clear: the output must start with h2.
4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions
4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions
, not
.
4.3, 4.4, and 4.5—Level and vertical alignment and cross-sectional dimensions
Construction techniques
The feasibility of a tolerance depends on available craftsmanship, technology, and materials.
Properties of materials
The specified degree of accuracy for shrinkage and prestressed camber should recognize the degree of difficulty of predetermined deflection due to shrinkage and prestressed camber.
Compatibility
Designers are cautioned to use finish and architectural details that are compatible with the type and anticipated method of construction. Finish and architectural details used should be compatible with the concrete tolerances which are achievable.
Job conditions
Unique job situations and conditions must be considered. The designer must specify and clearly identify those items that require either closer or more lenient tolerances as the needs of the project dictate.
Measurement
Mutually agreed-upon control points and bench marks must be provided as reference points for measurements to establish the degree of accuracy of items produced and for verifying the tolerances of the items produced. Control points and bench marks should be established and maintained in an undisturbed condition until final completion and acceptance of the project.
Project document references
ACI Specification documents—The following American Concrete Institute documents provide mandatory requirements for concrete construction and may be referenced in the Project Documents:
ACI 117 Standard Specifications for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials
ACI 301 Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings
ACI 531.1 Specification for Concrete Masonry Construction
ACI informative documents—ACI Committee Reports, Guides, Standard Practices, and Commentaries are intended for guidance in designing, planning, executing, or inspecting construction, and in preparing plans and specifications. Reference to these Reports, Guides, and Standard Practices should not be included in the Project Documents. If the Architect/Engineer desires to include items found in these ACI documents in the Project Documents, they should be rephrased in mandatory language and incorporated into the Project Documents.
The documents of the following American Concrete Institute Committees cover practice, procedures, and state-of-the-art guidance for the categories of construction as listed.
General building ACI 302, 303, 304, 318, 347
Special structures ACI 307, 313, 316, 325, 332, 334, 344, 345, 349, 350, 357, 358
Precast construction ACI 347
Masonry construction ACI 531
Materials ACI 211, 223, 302, 304, 315, 318, 531, 543
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction, p. 117R-1
Section 1—General requirements, p. 117R-2
Section 2—Materials, p. 117R-4
Section 3—Foundations, p. 117R-5
Section 4—Cast-in-place concrete for buildings, p. 117R-5
Section 5—Precast concrete, p. 117R-8
Section 6—Masonry, p. 117R-10
Section 7—Cast-in-place, vertically slipformed structures, p. 117R-10
Section 8—Mass concrete structures other than buildings, p. 117R-10
Section 9—Canal lining, p. 117R-10
Section 10—Monolithic siphons and culverts, p. 117R-10
Section 11—Cast-in-place bridges, p. 117R-10
Section 12—Pavement, p. 117R-10
Section 13—Chimneys and cooling towers, p. 117R-11
Section 14—Cast-in-place nonreinforced pipe, p. 117R-11
Section 15—References, p. 117R-11
SECTION 1—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.3—Definitions
Bowing—See Fig. 1.3.1.
Flatness—See Fig. 1.3.2.
Lateral alignment—See Fig. 1.3.3.
Level alignment—See Fig. 1.3.4.
Relative alignment—See Fig. 1.3.5.
Vertical alignment—See Fig. 1.3.6.
Warping—See Fig. 1.3.7.
Level alignment, lateral alignment, and vertical alignment are used to establish a tolerance envelope within which permissible variations can occur. Relative alignment, in addition to designating allowable relative displacements of elements, is used to determine the rate of change of adjacent points (slope tolerance) occurring within the tolerance envelope. In this fashion the slope and smoothness of surfaces and lines within a tolerance envelope are controlled. Abrupt
2
TOLERANCES
|
Fig. 1.3.1—Bowing Fig. 1.3.2—Flatness Fig. 1.3.3—Lateral alignment |
Fig. 1.3.4—Level alignment Fig. 1.3.5—Relative alignment Fig. 1.3.6—Vertical alignment Fig. 1.3.7—Warping |
3
SECTION 2—MATERIALS
2.2—Reinforcement
In the absence of specific design details shown or specified on the contract documents, CRSI MSP-1, Appendix D, should be followed by estimators, detailers, and placers.
2.2.2 and 2.2.3 The tolerance for placing reinforcing steel is predicated upon measurements of the formed surfaces for quality control during construction and from the resulting surfaces for forensic analysis. It consists of an envelope with an absolute limitation on one side of the envelope
2.5—Concrete
|
2.5.1 Where the specification has specified slump as a maximum, the project specifications should provide for the addition of water at the jobsite for slump adjustment. This is because the concrete must be batched at a lesser slump to avoid rejection because of a lack of a plus tolerance for the slump. The water added at the jobsite must be within the water/cement limitations of the specifications or approved mixture proportions. Flowable concrete achieved by the incorporation of high range water reducers (HRWR) (superplasticizers), are difficult to control within tight tolerances at specified slumps of 7 in. or greater. In addition, it is difficult to accurately measure high slumps. Consideration should be given to eliminating a maximum slump when a HRWR is used to achieve flowable concrete. When a slump range is specified, caution should be exercised and jobsite conditions should be considered and evaluated to determined if the range is suitable for delivery and placing requirements. 2.5.2 When an air content range is specified, care should be given to address aggregate size and jobsite requirements. The range should be adequately wide to accommodate the preceding. SECTION 3—FOUNDATIONS3.2—Lateral alignment3.2.1 Determines the permissible location of a footing. The magnitude of tolerance for the location of footings is governed by the width (i.e., least dimension in plan view) of the footing with an absolute limit depending on the subsequent construction material supported by the footing. See Fig. 3.2.1. 3.3—Level alignmentDetermines the location of any point on the top surface of a footing relative to the specified plane. See Fig. 3.3.1. 3.4—Cross-sectional dimensionDetermines the permissible size of a footing. See Fig. 3.4. 3.5—Relative alignmentThe relative alignment of points on the surfaces cannot exceed the distance determined by the slope tolerance. Determines the permissible top surface roughness or irregularity of a footing. See Fig. 3.5. SECTION 4—CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS4.1, 4.4, and 4.5—Vertical and relative alignment and thicknessDetermines the permissible location of surfaces and lines in a vertical plane and the smoothness of those surfaces or straightness of lines and the relative location of adjacent surfaces in a vertical plane. See Fig. 4.1(a) and (b) and 4.5.3(a) and (b). |
Fig. 3.2.1—Footing lateral alignment Fig. 3.3.1—Level alignment Fig. 3.4—Footing cross-sectional dimension Fig. 3.5—Relative alignment of footing surface |
5
预览内容由文件识别整理,表格、公式及文字请以原始文件为准。
原文图片预览
PAGE IMAGES下载标准文件
ACI 117R-90 Commentary on Standard Specification f
英语 · PDF · 6 页 · 324.24 KB



